Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Separate super purpose from tax debate - FSC

"Federal-Budget-2011"/"funds-management"/

8 April 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has urged the Government to separate defining the purpose of superannuation from the current tax debate, arguing that super should not be defined by short-term considerations.

The FSC's submission to the Treasury on the objectives of superannuation also makes clear that the objective should be defined in stand-alone legislation and that the relevant minister should be required to issue a "statement of compatibility" when seeking to make legislative changes to the superannuation regime.

However, in arguing that the objective of superannuation should be separated from the current tax debate the FSC appears to have reinforced its view that the Government should not be seeking to use superannuation to fill Budget holes for other short-term purposes.

"The objective of superannuation should have a long-term focus and not be driven by short-term influences, such as the current tax debate," the submission said. "The FSC supports removing this consultation from the distorting effect of the tax debate and ensuring that any definition of the objective has bi-partisan support and is enduring."

It said the FSC also recommended the objective of superannuation is enshrined in stand-alone legislation, rather than in existing superannuation law, "as the former provides a single reference point for relevant future changes to superannuation, tax or social security policy".

It said stand-alone legislation would hard code an agreed definition and place an obligation on the relevant Minister to make a ‘statement of compatibility' with the objective of the system when legislation is introduced that impacts on the superannuation system.

"The Act would not prescribe what information is necessary for a statement of compatibility, but leave this for the Minister to determine," the submission said. "This places the onus on external stakeholders to assess the robustness of a statement of compatibility and publicly hold the Government to account for unpersuasive statements."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND