Restrictions on super choice inefficient and unacceptable: Govt

SMSFA SMSF Jane Hume Choice your super fees

24 February 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Government is committed to fixing restrictions to superannuation fund choice but will not prevent a default fund being specified in an award, according to the Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology, Jane Hume.

In address at the SMSF Association’s National Conference, Hume, said there were thousands of workers that were being forced into some of the worst-performing default products as a result of restrictions on choice.

“Restricting choice of fund means there are workers who are forced to hold multiple accounts because their employer refuses to allow them to choose their own fund. Even where a newly hired worker is perfectly happy with their existing fund. Perhaps their own self-managed fund,” she said.

“That’s why we are committed to the Your Super, Your Choice Bill. We’re committed to removing the law that sanctions such restrictions, to help prevent the proliferation of multiple accounts and because it’s in members’ best interests.

“These changes have been on the Government’s agenda for a long time and are particularly important for those in the self-managed sector.”

Hume said the recent changes to cap fees and ban exit fees would prevent these new accounts from being eroded to zero though people were still being forced to open and pay for a super account they did not want or need.

“This is unacceptable. It’s inefficient. It ultimately reduces peoples’ savings for retirement. And this Government is going to fix it. Let’s be clear. This new law will not remove the ability of workers to collectively bargain over the default super fund covering a workplace,” Hume said.

“It doesn’t prevent a default fund being specified in an award. And given the current state of inertia in the system, most workers will probably stay in that default fund. But for those who are engaged with their super, if they are happy with their existing fund –– they should have the right to direct their employer’s super contributions there.

“They should not have to open yet another super account, just because their employer refuses to give them any choice at all as a result of some enterprise agreement.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 9 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 13 hours ago