Prudential regulation “flies in the face” of SMSFs: SPAA
Prudential regulation would be a poor fit for the individualist nature of self-managed super funds (SMSFs), the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) believes.
In a submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), SPAA said the current approach to regulation, in which the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has oversight, is “working well” and should not be changed in line with other superannuation products.
“SPAA does not support the prudential regulation of SMSFs because it is unsuitable for the nature of SMSFs where trustees are required to manage their own retirement savings,” SPAA senior manager, technical and policy, Jordan George, said.
“Prudential regulation is appropriate where money is being managed on behalf of another person that has little ability to influence the trustee responsible for managing their retirement savings.”
George said prudential regulation “flies in the face of” what SMSFs represent.
The submission followed calls for SMSFs to be regulated like other financial products.
SPAA noted Treasury similarly supported the ATO remaining as the sole compliance regulator of SMSFs.
“The SPAA FSI submission also acknowledged that the ATO’s SMSF regulatory activities have been effective to the extent that the vast majority of SMSF trustees are complying with the taxation and superannuation laws,” George said.
Recommended for you
The financial services technology firm has officially launched its digital advice and education solution for superannuation funds and other industry players.
The ETF provider has flagged a number of developments as it formally enters the superannuation space through a major acquisition.
While all MySuper products successfully passed the latest performance test, trustee-directed products encountered difficulties.
Iress has appointed Insignia Financial’s former general manager of master trust and insurance products as its newest CEO of superannuation, who will take over from Paul Giles.