Prohibit employers’ banks from default funds - ISA

default funds FOFA financial planning financial advice industry super australia super funds chief executive government

13 August 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has sought to use new research released by the McKell Institute to defend its position on the need for the Government to retain the existing default funds under modern awards regime.

As well the ISA has claimed that vertical integration in the financial advice space poses significant risks to the default fund selection process.

Referencing the research, ISA chief executive, David Whiteley claimed the McKell data had indicated that the age at which you retired could boil down to the type of super fund you are a member of and pointed to not for profit funds having outperformed funds "owned by the banks" over the medium and long term.

"This alarming finding reinforces the need for a default super safety net to ensure that only the best performing super funds are default funds," Whiteley said. "With eight in ten Australians not choosing their own super fund there needs to be a default super safety net that ensures only the very best performing funds over the long term can be default funds."

He claimed that "bank-owned" super funds were seeking to abolish the safety net and intended to cross-sell their super funds by leveraging existing business banking relationships.

Whiteley said that the problem was also compounded "because of the recent bank-friendly changes to financial advice laws to allow banks and other retail funds to pay sales incentives to staff selling super products and to allow commissions paid on super products to automatically continue when a member is transferred into a pension product with the same provider".

"As ISA has consistently argued, concentration in banking and vertically integrated financial advice businesses means there are significant risks in the default fund selection process," he said.

"In the long run, the only logical solution is to prohibit banks or related entities from providing default super fund services to employees where the bank is the main banking provider to the employer," Whiteley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 4 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 3 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 days 13 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS