Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Profiteering banks a drag on Aussie retirement: ISA

ISA/productivity-commission/retirement/Australian-retirement/

7 November 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image image
expand image

The Productivity Commission (PC) should focus on the world's best retirement income systems and a key difference between those systems and Australia's is the for-profit motives of the banks, according to the Industry Super Australia (ISA).

ISA's chief executive officer, David Whiteley, noted that what separated Australia from the best systems was the fact it allowed for-profit funds to participate, "despite clear and serious conflicts of interest".

According to Mercer's 2016 Global Pension index, the retirement income systems of Denmark, the Netherlands and Australia, were ranked first, second and third, respectively. Additionally, Chile and New Zealand were being held up as exemplars in the Productivity Commission's review process.

According to Whiteley, the best systems should involve both employee and employer representatives working together to secure delivery of income for retirees and, as he stressed, they were not about generating profits for banks and financial institutions.

ISA, in its submission to the review, highlighted the key features of the successful Danish and Dutch systems that were already visible in the Australian industry, corporate and public sector default funds, such as:

  • Trusted providers run on a not-for-profit basis only for the benefit of members;
  • Industry or multi-industry funds generally affiliated with or approved by industrial parties; and
  • Wholesale rather than retail in structure to leverage scale and minimise costs.

"The approach to superannuation in Denmark and the Netherlands — along with the part of Australia's system built and maintained by union and employers — is internationally lauded," Whiteley said.

"The key difference is that these systems and institutions put member interests above those of others, including shareholders.

"Super is different to banking and industry super funds are deliberately different to bank super funds."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND