Profiteering banks a drag on Aussie retirement: ISA

ISA productivity commission retirement Australian retirement

7 November 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Productivity Commission (PC) should focus on the world's best retirement income systems and a key difference between those systems and Australia's is the for-profit motives of the banks, according to the Industry Super Australia (ISA).

ISA's chief executive officer, David Whiteley, noted that what separated Australia from the best systems was the fact it allowed for-profit funds to participate, "despite clear and serious conflicts of interest".

According to Mercer's 2016 Global Pension index, the retirement income systems of Denmark, the Netherlands and Australia, were ranked first, second and third, respectively. Additionally, Chile and New Zealand were being held up as exemplars in the Productivity Commission's review process.

According to Whiteley, the best systems should involve both employee and employer representatives working together to secure delivery of income for retirees and, as he stressed, they were not about generating profits for banks and financial institutions.

ISA, in its submission to the review, highlighted the key features of the successful Danish and Dutch systems that were already visible in the Australian industry, corporate and public sector default funds, such as:

  • Trusted providers run on a not-for-profit basis only for the benefit of members;
  • Industry or multi-industry funds generally affiliated with or approved by industrial parties; and
  • Wholesale rather than retail in structure to leverage scale and minimise costs.

"The approach to superannuation in Denmark and the Netherlands — along with the part of Australia's system built and maintained by union and employers — is internationally lauded," Whiteley said.

"The key difference is that these systems and institutions put member interests above those of others, including shareholders.

"Super is different to banking and industry super funds are deliberately different to bank super funds."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS