PC’s super report delivers on Government’s terms

productivity commission competition superannuation turnbull government

29 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Inadequate competition, governance and regulation have led to a situation in which many Australians are not achieving an optimal outcome from superannuation, including being signed up to underperforming funds, holding unintended multiple accounts and having their balances eroded by unsuitable insurance.

That is the bottom line of the Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) third tranche assessment of Efficiency and Competitiveness in the Australian superannuation industry.

In making that assessment, the PC has delivered squarely on the terms of reference outlined by the Government more than two years’ ago, and it will be up to the Turnbull Government or its Labor successor to decide what is to be done about the shortcoming identified in the draft report.

It will be pleased with the PC’s recommendation that members should only ever be allocated to a default fund once, upon entering the workforce, and that they should be empowered to choose from a “best on show” shortlist set by an independent competitive process.

What will not please the Turnbull Government, however, is that the PC’s assessment that “most (but not all) underperforming products are in the retail segment”, but it will be pleased by the assessment that Labor’s default funds under modern awards regime has led to inadequate competition.

The PC’s draft report concluded that “rivalry between funds in the default segment is superficial, and there are signs of unhealthy competition in the choice segment (including the proliferation of over 40,000 products)”.

It said that while the default segment outperformed the system on average, the way members were allocated to default products left some exposed to the costly risk of being defaulted into an underperforming fund.

Further, the report said the regulators focused too much on funds rather than members, with sub-par data and disclosure inhibiting accountability to members and regulators.

The PC’s draft report findings also stand to erode the MySuper outcome of the Labor-initiated Cooper Review, arguing for an elevated threshold for MySuper authorisation and more encouragement for members to get “engaged in products they can easily and safely choose from”.

“This is superior to other default models – it side-steps employers and puts decision-making back with members in a way that supports them with safer, simpler choice,” it said.

The PC’s draft report also backed the Government’s push for stronger super fund governance, especially around board appoints and mergers, and urged funds to do more to provide insurance that was valuable to members.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS