Opposition puts heat on industry super fund watchdogs

industry superannuation funds government and regulation APRA federal opposition australian prudential regulation authority money management senator mathias cormann australian securities and investments commission director

10 November 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Opposition is maintaining pressure on Australia's two financial services regulators, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), to reveal how they are handling the activities of industry superannuation funds.

In what Money Management understands to be a reflection of the concern held by key Coalition parliamentarians about the amount of influence being wielded by some senior Labor Party/union officials, the regulators have been asked a series of questions on notice going to the heart of how they handle industry funds.

Much of the activity directed towards the regulators has been generated by Tasmanian Liberal Senator David Bushby, but the Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann, has also raised the issues during Senate Estimates.

In a series of questions on notice directed to APRA, Bushby has asked how many enforcement actions the regulator has undertaken in the last three years "in relation to flawed unit pricing and asset valuation practices in superannuation funds".

"And without naming the entities concerned, what were the outcomes for each [fines, court action, disqualifications, asset freeze, enforcement undertakings etc]?" Bushby said.

Bushby has also asked how many formal and informal actions APRA has taken in relation to unresolved conflict of interest issues in relation to superannuation fund governance during the past three years, and what were the results of taking such action.

The Tasmanian has also asked APRA about its policy on superannuation fund directors who hold multiple directorships in the super fund sector, and inquired about the number of occasions on which the regulator has raised the issue with a fund which had a director in such a position, and with what results.

With ASIC already having been placed on notice to explain whether the recent rash of industry superannuation fund television advertisements are compliant, Money Management understands its approach to the advertising campaign will be subject to further questioning and scrutiny in Parliamentary committees.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS