O’Dwyer questions profit-sharing between super funds and insurers

superannuation Insurers super funds Kelly O'Dwyer

11 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Profit-sharing arrangements between insurance companies and some major superannuation funds have come under scrutiny by the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer and have been directed for the attention of the Productivity Commission (PC).

The profit-sharing arrangements have often been the subject of criticism by financial planners and O’Dwyer used a radio interview to question whether such arrangements were actually in the best interests of superannuation fund members.

Discussing the broad question of insurance within superannuation and the manner in which premiums could erode account balances, the minister said it all became a question of what was in the best interests of members and the industry needed to justify such arrangements.

“There are also arrangements where there are profit-share arrangements with a number of these funds as well, and again, the question is – are individual members actually getting the benefit of that or, in fact, is the fund itself getting the benefit and that not being passed on?” O’Dwyer said.

Her comments follow on from last year’s submissions to the Joint Parliamentary Committee reviewing the Life Insurance industry in which one major insurer pointed to the existence of the so-called profit-sharing arrangements but said it believed the rebates provided to the superannuation fund were then put to work for members.

Financial planners have argued that the profit-sharing rebates provided to superannuation funds, particularly industry funds, are similar to the volume rebates provided to dealer groups which were outlawed under the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

Elsewhere in her discussion of insurance and superannuation, O’Dwyer spoke openly of the need for change in the superannuation sector claiming that while some people in the industry believed it was perfect and not in need of change, the truth was the industry might be doing better than the individuals it was meant to serve.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 6 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 1 week ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 5 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 week ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

6 days 20 hours ago