More questions confronting ASIC

commonwealth financial planning ASIC peter kell superannuation complaints tribunal storm financial australian securities and investments commission chairman money management

26 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) may have to explain to a Parliamentary Committee why, when its resources are stretched, it has expended effort reviewing the operations of an independent statutory body, the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT). 

The chairman of the Parliamentary Committee reviewing ASIC’s activities in light of its handling of events leading up to the Commonwealth Financial Planning enforceable undertaking, Senator David Bushby, confirmed he would be raising the SCT investigation exercise in the committee if the regulator did not provide the necessary answers to questions on notice. 

He said that given the breadth of the inquiry into ASIC’s operations and performance - and confirmation that ASIC’s review of the SCT was not “formal” - such questions were justified.  

Bushby has used a Senate Estimates Committee to extract confirmation from ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell that the regulator had expended time and resources “looking at how the SCT operates”. 

Kell said this was because “the SCT is within ASIC, effectively, in terms of funding. We have regular dialogue with the SCT about its operations and its funding. We thought that it was timely to conduct such a review”.  

Asked by Bushby whether the options being examined by ASIC included “withdrawing SCT-specific funding by ASIC and rolling its activities more generally into ASIC or some other agency”, Kell said he would have to take the question on notice. 

However, he acknowledged that there had been no industry consultations on the issue and claimed that if there were any proposals likely to affect the SCT’s operations in any significant way, “then we would as a matter of course talk more broadly to stakeholders, industry and government”. 

Bushby last week confirmed to Money Management that the Parliamentary Committee was likely to range beyond ASIC’s handling of the Commonwealth Financial Planning enforceable undertaking to examine issues such as its handling of the Trio/Astarra collapse and Storm Financial.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 5 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 20 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 day ago