More than 440 AMP customers want insurance reinstated

amp superannuation pys amp super insurance

22 July 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

AMP has received more than 440 customer requests to reinstate insurance cancelled as a result of the Government’s Protecting Your Superannuation legislation and it is warning the situation could get worse if the Government does not delay the implementation of further legislation impact insurance inside superannuation.

AMP also revealed that more than 5,000 of its superannuation customers with inactive accounts under the new Protecting Your Super rules and with balances less than $6,000 had elected to retain their insurance.

In a submission filed with the Senate Economics Legislation committee, AMP said the proposed 1 October 2019 commencement date for the new legislation – the Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Members’ Interests First) Bill 2019 did not provide sufficient time for customers impacted by the low balance account measure to comprehend the impact of the changes or consider their circumstances.

“Based on customer responses to engagement in respect of the PYS changes, AMP does not believe sufficient time was provided for customers with inactive accounts to comprehend the impact of the changes, consider their circumstances and make an informed decision about whether to keep their insurance, before it was cancelled from 1 July 2019,” it said.

“Despite the considerable effort AMP made to communicate the PYS changes to our customers, and the combined efforts the industry made to raise awareness before and after 1 May 2019, as at 15 July 2019 we have received more than 440 customer requests to reinstate insurance cancelled as a result of PYS.

“This was a significant increase from the first week, where on 8 July we had received 47 customer requests for insurance reinstatement,” AMP said.

“We anticipate the number of insurance reinstatement requests to continue to increase as customers receive insurance cancellation notices.

“Based on the customer experience and response to the PYS changes which allowed for two months’ notice prior to cancellation, we believe that longer than two months’ prior notice is required to ensure customers with low balance accounts are not adversely impacted by the proposed PMIF changes.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS