Low super fees does not mean high returns

superannuation/

27 April 2015
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Fees are not the most important factor when comparing superannuation funds, and have little correlation with fund performance or retirement outcomes, research by SuperRatings reveals.

SuperRatings chief executive, Adam Gee, said the net benefit should be the main consideration when comparing funds.

"Fees are, at best, only loosely correlated with value and any assessment of a superannuation fund should be made using a broad range of criteria, with 'net benefit' being the only meaningful basis for comparison of fees and investment performance," Gee said.

"While some commentators suggest a tender process to appoint default funds as the best way to drive fee savings, SuperRatings believes this is an ill-conceived concept and any assessment based on only one criterion, is fraught with danger."

Gee said when measuring overall value consideration must be given to other issues such as member services, administration capabilities, governance, and insurance offerings.  

The report found that a fund with the lowest fee (ranked first) ranked 96 in earnings ranking and had a net benefit ranking of 41 out of 162. On the other hand, the fund with a fee ranking of 78 was seventh in earnings ranking, and came second in net benefit.

The report noted that despite the eight per cent drop in super fees across the sector it was concerned about the manner in which some fee cuts were achieved.

"In a number of cases, fund managers have moved their entire portfolio from being actively managed to a fully passive, index approach, with investment returns simply aiming to replicate the underlying indices, in a virtual race to the bottom based on fees," Gee said.

The report said the fact that operating costs were increasing along with declining fund membership would mean ongoing cost reductions would be unsustainable.

The report took into account Superannuation Guarantee contributions, fees, taxes, and investment returns, over a 10 year period based on an opening account balance and salary of $50,000.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND