Lack of capacity overlooked in SMSFs

trustee/SMSFs/

24 October 2011
| By Damon Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Not preparing for loss of capacity within a self managed super fund (SMSF) can severely cripple that fund's day-to-day operation and is an issue not on enough trustee radars, according to Bryce Figot, Senior Associate at DBA Lawyers.

Outlining the most common scenario, Figot said that it began with the lack of an appointed enduring power of attorney.

"And that is all too common," he said. "The next part of this scenario, and this is the case in about two thirds of SMSFs, is that you've got Mum and Dad members and Mum and Dad as individual trustees.

"So if Dad's a bit older and he loses capacity, what a lot of people don't realise is that, under general law, you actually need all trustees to come together to make a decision."

Figot said that even in the event of a loss of capacity, a trustee's obligations were not relinquished and added that there was no law that could change that fact.

"So for the remaining trustee, Mum in this instance, if she wants to make a decision, Dad also has to make that decision and that may not necessarily be possible."

However, according to Figot, that is just the short version of the story. The longer version is that there may be a way out of it.

"So, for example, each state has its own special Trustee Act and most deeds actually have provisions regarding how you can go about hiring and firing the trustee," he said. "And hopefully your specific state or territory's Trustee Act or the actual trust deed will provide a solution but, at that stage, you're just hoping for the right outcome rather than having a planned outcome.

"Of course, that's just the vanilla scenario," added Figot. "It can get much hairier if Mum and Dad are on their second marriage with kids from a previous relationship, particularly if the wrong person gets control of the fund.

"They might attempt to rip all the money out of the fund, knowing that any challenges are going to have to go through the Supreme Court, could take up to 10 years and be extraordinarily messy in the meantime."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 days 1 hour ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND