ISA condemns banks on super fees

financial-planning/superannuation/ISA/bank/

12 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In the same week that the Parliament is due to consider legislation changing governance arrangements for superannuation funds, Industry Super Australia (ISA) has released new research which it claims points to the dominance and lack of transparency of the major banks and wealth managers.

The research, commissioned by the ISA and conducted by Rainmaker Information, claims the big banks are taking one-third of all fees paid to superannuation funds, suggesting the superannuation industry drew an estimated $30 billion in fees in 2014/15, with 91 per cent of that revenue paid to commercial wealth management businesses, and 33 per cent to the four big banks.

It found that only nine per cent was paid to not-for-profit trustees for administration and operations.

The findings have prompted ISA chief executive, David Whiteley, to point to a lack of transparency on the part of the major banks and wealth management firms.

"Fees are being generated a number of ways by the vertically-integrated wealth management arms of the banks, including platform superannuation, funds management, financial advice, group insurance and asset consultancy," Whiteley said.

"However these services are carried out within the banks' conglomerates with very little or no transparency."

He said this should be cause for concern for fund members and an area ripe for disclosure reforms by law makers and regulatory authorities.

"Compulsory superannuation is a foundation of our retirement income system, it should never be a honey pot for the big four banks," Whiteley said.

"Parliamentarians need to crack open the opaque structures of these vertically-integrated business units and subsidiaries and reassure the public that the banks are in fact prioritising the interests of super fund members before profits, as required by their fiduciary obligations," he said.

"In the interests of safeguarding Australians' retirement savings, all politicians should reject a Bill due to come before federal Parliament this week that would impose the faulty governance structure of for-profit funds onto not-for profit funds."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks 1 day ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS