ISA backs ALP’s dividend imputation move

industry super australia Bill Shorten superannuation

14 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has given substantial support to the Federal Oppositions proposals to remove dividend imputation refunds, but has found itself significantly at odds with other superannuation industry organisations.

While ISA chief executive, David Whitley claimed Labor’s proposed changes would have little or no impact on most superannuation fund members, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) said the changes would have a significant impact on low-income retirees both inside and outside of superannuation.

At the same time, the Financial Services Council (FC) warned that changes would act as a tax increase for many retirees and have many unintended adverse consequences, while the SMSF Association said the ALP’s move would undermine confidence in the superannuation system.

ASFA chief executive, Martin Fahey said that, as well, constant tinkering with the settings would continue to undermine confidence in the superannuation system.

“The system already has a $1.6 million cap in the retirement phase and our analysis show recent reforms to superannuation and the retirement funding system are working with time needed for these changes to be bedded down,” Fahy said. “If there is a concern about individuals with large retirement savings receiving the benefit of refundable imputation credits then this would be better addressed by measures more closely linked to retirement balance.”

“At face value, it appears that this proposal would impact Mum and Dad investors both through their superannuation and through the shares they own outside of super and compromise the long-standing investment neutrality principle,” he said. “There are a range of critical questions which need to be addressed, including whether the proposal would drive a bias to certain asset classes or distort the system in other ways.”

ISA’s Whiteley described the ALP policy proposal as “sensible” and suggested that it could significantly improve the fairness of the superannuation system if some of the savings were then reinvested to ensure the system responded to the changing nature of work which was stunting the retirement savings of women and millions of other low and middle-income earners.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS