Industry pushes back on insurance inside super

superannuation/insurance/federal-budget/ASFA/Deloitte/FSC/

9 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government is facing significant push-back from both the superannuation and insurance industries over its Budget announcement allowing low balance holders under 25 to opt out of insurance inside superannuation.

Virtually all elements of the superannuation industry have warned that the Budget measure comes at the risk of leaving a significant cohort of younger workers under-insured, while the Financial Planning Association (FPA) has suggested that opting out of insurance inside superannuation should not occur without people being given the opportunity to access advice.

Deloitte head of superannuation, Russell Mason set the tone of the superannuation industry concerns when he said there was a risk that a lot of people would become unintentionally uninsured.

“Younger members with dependents may well become inadvertently uninsured,” he said.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) also expressed concern, noting the Budget measure could be particularly dangerous for those in high-risk occupations.

ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy said the Budget shift to an opt-in model would put insurance coverage at risk for many young people who had dependents and financial commitments.

The Financial Services Council (FSC) chief executive, Sally Loane also warned that the policy shift could see younger Australians slipping through the safety net.

“It will be incumbent on superannuation fund trustees, particularly those in the default system, to engage and communicate more effectively with their under-25-year-old members to ensure they understand the implications of the policy change,” she said.

Even before the Budget had been handed down, specialist lawyer, Paul Watson said that while he welcomed reports the Government intended to legislate to make insurance in super opt-in for people under 25, he was concerned that disability insurance cover was also being removed.

He said that death insurance had historically been poorly targeted for under 25s because they did not usually have financial dependents or mortgages, but they did suffer from disabilities and injuries which could prevent them from working.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

3 weeks 6 days ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 5 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS