Industry presents united front on retaining LISC

ASFA/funds-management/association-of-superannuation-funds/government/superannuation-funds/superannuation-guarantee/treasury/AIST/chief-executive/

6 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The superannuation industry has presented a united front to the Government on the need to retain the Low Income Superannuation Contribution (LISC), with both the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) and the Australian Institute of Super Trustees (AIST) saying it should survive the removal of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.

An ASFA submission to the Treasury has gone so far as to argue that retention of the LISC is more important in equity terms than the on-time delivery of the increase in superannuation guarantee.

The ASFA submission, signed by the organisation's chief executive, Pauline Vamos, suggests the Government should resort to other means of funding the LISC, in circumstances where the superannuation co-contribution regime will be insufficient to offset the inequity with respect to low income earners.

"ASFA does not consider that the Superannuation Co-contribution is sufficient to address the

inequity of low income earners paying too much tax on their concessional contributions," it said. "The co-contribution only applies in regard to voluntary, non-concessional contributions made as a

discretionary spend from after tax income."

The submission claimed that only around one million individuals qualified for the co-contribution each

year, with a substantial proportion of those qualifying having incomes over $37,000.

"ASFA considers that while the co-contribution serves a purpose in encouraging voluntary contributions as a matter of equity, building confidence and ensuring that low income earners can top up their age pensions adequately requires the LISC to be maintained," it said.

The submission said that in regard to the relative impact of the two superannuation measures in the Government's legislation, the removal of the LISC "has a much bigger impact in absolute terms for the workers concerned, although clearly the pause in the SG affects more employees".

"As such, while ASFA does not support either proposed measure, we have particular concerns with the proposed abolition of the LISC and recommend strongly that this be reconsidered," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks 1 day ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS