Industry presents united front on retaining LISC

ASFA funds management association of superannuation funds government superannuation funds superannuation guarantee treasury AIST chief executive

6 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The superannuation industry has presented a united front to the Government on the need to retain the Low Income Superannuation Contribution (LISC), with both the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) and the Australian Institute of Super Trustees (AIST) saying it should survive the removal of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.

An ASFA submission to the Treasury has gone so far as to argue that retention of the LISC is more important in equity terms than the on-time delivery of the increase in superannuation guarantee.

The ASFA submission, signed by the organisation's chief executive, Pauline Vamos, suggests the Government should resort to other means of funding the LISC, in circumstances where the superannuation co-contribution regime will be insufficient to offset the inequity with respect to low income earners.

"ASFA does not consider that the Superannuation Co-contribution is sufficient to address the

inequity of low income earners paying too much tax on their concessional contributions," it said. "The co-contribution only applies in regard to voluntary, non-concessional contributions made as a

discretionary spend from after tax income."

The submission claimed that only around one million individuals qualified for the co-contribution each

year, with a substantial proportion of those qualifying having incomes over $37,000.

"ASFA considers that while the co-contribution serves a purpose in encouraging voluntary contributions as a matter of equity, building confidence and ensuring that low income earners can top up their age pensions adequately requires the LISC to be maintained," it said.

The submission said that in regard to the relative impact of the two superannuation measures in the Government's legislation, the removal of the LISC "has a much bigger impact in absolute terms for the workers concerned, although clearly the pause in the SG affects more employees".

"As such, while ASFA does not support either proposed measure, we have particular concerns with the proposed abolition of the LISC and recommend strongly that this be reconsidered," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 3 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS