Industry funds question SMSF drivers

SMSF smsf trustees AIST government and regulation property financial planning SMSFs self-managed superannuation funds industry super funds superannuation trustees industry super australia advice industry funds australian securities and investments commission

13 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Two bodies representing industry super funds have called for improvement in the quality of advice provided to clients, questioning some of the drivers behind the growth of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and Industry Super Australia (ISA) have lodged a joint submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Consultation Paper 216, which discusses advice provided to SMSFs, specific disclosure requirements and associated costs.

The two associations expressed support for an enhanced regulatory regime that imposes an obligation on financial planners, accountants and others who provide a "critical entry point on the establishment of SMSFs", which they said would ensure clients made an informed decision.

They pointed to ASIC's review of advice provided to SMSF trustees, which highlighted that only one piece of advice was characterised as good, with close to 30 per cent being deemed poor by the regulator.

"There is a clear need for improvement in the quality of advice provided to clients," the submission said.

"The proposed disclosure requirements in the consultation paper will go a long way to improving the quality of advice."

AIST and ISA also expressed concern about the so-called "push or pull" factors in the establishment of an SMSF and the aggressive marketing of SMSFs as a vehicle for property investment.

The submission stressed it was not only property spruikers who were encouraging clients to invest in property using this method.

"SMSF seminars and wide-scale advertising by service providers are promoting the establishment of SMSFs," the submission said.

"There is to date no adequate published survey of SMSF trustees which analyses the main drivers behind the rapid growth in SMSFs," the two industry bodies added.

"There is a need for work to be undertaken which informs policy makers and regulators and ultimately adds to policy formation which would assist SMSF trustees and those considering the establishment of a self-managed fund."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 days 8 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS