Industry funds confirm CEOs earning over $1 million

super funds CEOs ian silk hostplus David Elia AustralianSuper aware super Deanne Stewart Vicki doyle CareSuper

4 December 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

At least two industry superannuation fund chief executives are receiving total salary packages in excess of $1 million, while at least two more are receiving over $800,000. 

That is the bottom line of answers to questions provided to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics which has sought to interrogate a number of superannuation funds about the salaries of their chief executives and then draw comparisons with the wages earned by the average member of their superannuation funds. 

What the questioning, undertaken by the chairman of the committee, Victorian Liberal backbencher, Tim Wilson, has revealed is that among those funds that have so far responded, industry superannuation fund chief executives are paid anywhere between $588,000 and $1.1 million. 

At the top of the tree is Ian Silk, the chief executive of the largest industry superannuation, AustralianSuper who is receiving a package of $1,111,234 but as high as this seems it needs to be measured against that of Hostplus chief executive, David Elia who is receiving a base package of $899,045 plus $221,979 in short-term bonuses. 

Then, too, there is Aware Super (formerly First State Super) boss, Deanne Stewart who is receiving a base package of $905,000 plus a performance bonus of $125,000 and HESTA chief executive, Debbi Blakey who is receiving $915,690 and REST chief executive, Vicki Doyle whose package was valued at $826,000 made up of a base of $646,330 and an annual bonus of $158,976. 

This then compares to CareSuper’s Julie Lander who received a comparatively modest package of $588,136. 

None of the superannuation fund chief executive salaries have been a secret, with each of them having met their regulatory obligations by reporting them within the fund’s annual statements and with some of them directing Wilson’s attention to those statement rather than spelling out the salary amounts out in answer to his questions. 

Wilson had asked each of the funds to advise the salary of their CEOs including any bonuses, and then asked that, “for each year of the past decade, please advise the: 

a. annual remuneration of the average worker who contributes to your fund 

b. average annual superannuation contribution from an employee to your fund 

c. multiple your CEO is remunerated compared to the annual remuneration of the average worker who contributes to your fund. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 12 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 16 hours ago