Industry funds claim RG97 disadvantage
There is a danger that industry and other “profit to member” superannuation funds will be shown in a bad light by the new fee disclosure arrangements entailed in Regulatory Guide 97 (RG97).
Further, industry funds-based organisation, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has told the Senate Economics Legislation Committee that specialist superannuation research and ratings house, SuperRatings had indicated that the implementation of implementation of RG97 is unlikely to resolve all differences regarding fee and cost disclosure.
It said that in these circumstances, “legislative prescription may be required to resolve comparability”.
However, on the question of RG97 and the comparability of fees, the AIST answer to a question on notice said SuperRatings had noted especially “that profit-to-member funds are likely to be adversely impacted due to their investment in a broader range of asset class than for-profit funds”.
And in an apparent swipe at retail superannuation funds and vertically-integrated structures, the AIST answer added: “We note also, that inconsistencies in treatment of interposed vehicles will necessarily create opacity in relation to related party payments. This must be resolved in order to correctly state costs associated with members’ investments”.
Recommended for you
AMP is to launch a digital advice service to provide retirement advice to members of its AMP Super Fund, in partnership with Bravura Solutions.
Unveiling its performance for the calendar year 2024, AMP has noted a “careful” investment in bitcoin futures proved beneficial for its superannuation members.
SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positive” returns.
The second tranche of DBFO reforms has received strong support from superannuation funds and insurers, with a new class of advisers aimed to support Australians with their retirement planning.
