Industry funds: change advice definition in TASA

future of financial advice government and regulation financial planning FPA industry funds industry super network AIST industry super funds financial advice reforms financial planning association parliamentary joint committee corporations act

18 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Two peak bodies are calling for a clearer definition of the word 'advice’, as the current wording of the Tax Agent Services Act (TASA) prohibits industry super funds from providing intra-fund advice. 

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and the Industry Super Network (ISN) lodged a joint submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) last Friday requesting the word 'advice’ be replaced with 'personal financial product advice’, which would exclude intra-fund advice from the requirements contained in TASA. 

AIST and ISN raised similar concerns to those of the Financial Planning Association, particularly with respect to the fact that the Act covers any professional who provides financial advice service where tax advice is provided. 

However, the two industry fund bodies are worried that 'advice’ is not limited to financial product advice and may include general strategies. 

“It is in this context that AIST and ISN do not believe that the limitation to services that are charged for as proposed in subsection 50-5(2A)(c) is restrictive enough,” the submission read. 

“Professionals who provide [intra-fund advice] services are a broad group and can include call centre operators, business development officers, member education personnel and others who would not ordinarily be considered to fall under the category of financial planners, as originally conceived.” 

The two bodies stated almost every discussion held with members would involve tax in one way or another and would thus constitute tax advice under the Act. 

It is for this reason that AIST and ISN believe that the wording should be changed. 

“Furthermore, AIST and ISN recommend that 'personal financial product advice’ have the same meaning as that contained at section 766B of the Corporations Act,” the submission read. 

The submission has also called for clear disclosure as to who would be responsible for the tax advice provided. It also raised questions about how the TASA regime would work in relation to the advisers’ best interest duty required under the Future of Financial Advice reforms package.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

4 days 11 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS