High allocations to growth not a ‘poor strategy’ for pre-retirees

pre-retirees retirement rice warner

4 December 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Adopting high allocations to growth assets is not inherently a poor strategy, even when members are approaching retirement, according to a report.

A paper written by Richard Dunn and Michael Berg called ‘Lifecycle Design – To and Through Retirement’ found that high growth asset funds improved outcomes when members were young, as a result of the ability to spread risk over the member’s investment horizon, without material risk of under performance in poor investment scenarios.

It also found that high allocation to growth assets improved outcomes where members were approaching retirement and investment outcomes were either neutral or strong, due to the higher expected return on growth assets.

The report that was presented at the 27th Colloquium on Pensions and Retirement Research noted that high growth allocations would provide marginally weaker outcomes, less than 5% underperformance over a member’s lifetime, in cases where investment performance was weak.

On the defensively focused lifecycle investments side – first-generation lifecycle strategies – the report said would “typically underperform other strategies unless investment returns were poor and the members it was designed for were approaching or were actively retired.”

Two-dimensional lifecycle strategies were also found to provide the ability to access material excess return by adopting a more growth-orientated stance while still being able to control the level of risk adopted by members.

“We would emphasise that it there is unlikely to be a single solution that meets the needs of all funds for all member cohorts. In ensuring that a funds default investment strategy design meets the needs of members, we anticipate that funds will need to regularly conduct regular reviews,” the report said.

“We anticipate that these reviews will include refreshed analysis of member segments and investment outlook to ensure that the fund’s proposition continues to optimise likely member outcomes.”

The reported noted that investment horizons were a critical driver in setting an appropriate investment strategy.

“…we consider it prudent that funds develop investment strategies which account for the range of investment horizons to which members are likely to be subject, both before and after retirement,” the paper said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 5 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

5 days 20 hours ago

A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 fo...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS