Future Fund unsuitable to be national pension scheme

rice warner Future Fund super funds superannuation funds AustralianSuper hostplus QSuper private equity Alternatives

8 October 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Using the Future Fund as a national retirement scheme would not be sensible as it has not performed any better than leading superannuation funds and liquidity could be an issue, according to Rice Warner.

An analysis by the research house said while there had been several calls to improve the “maligned superannuation system by using the Future Fund as a vehicle for all investments”, there were some glaring issues.

Rice Warner said that while over the 10 years to June 2019 the Future Fund earned 10.4% a year, but funds such as AustralianSuper super also did very well at 10.9% (in a tax-free pension phase), Hostplus and QSuper both at 10.4%.

The analysis noted that the Future Fund had a much higher percentage of private equity and alternatives than super funds, which was logical for the fund but would be difficult to reconcile with super funds’ requirements for:

  • Liquidity to ensure that benefit payments and investment switches can be honoured; and
  • Frequent pricing of units (daily or at most weekly) to make sure that these investment switches and benefit payments are made based on asset valuations which are accurate and equitable between members.

Rice Warner said much of the Future Fund’s success had come from investment strategies that were not suitable for super funds – which could not hold 30% of their assets in private equity and alternatives.

“Even with these advantages, the Future Fund has not done any better than leading superannuation funds,” it said.

“Further, success in its overall purpose of closing the funding gap in Federal Government defined benefit liabilities remains elusive. From 2007 to 2019, Commonwealth defined benefit liabilities net of the Future Fund have increased by a factor of five, from $50.3 billion to $252.6 billion.

“This is not to take anything away from the Future Fund. It has done very well with the assets entrusted to it.  However, this does not give any reason to believe that it would be the right vehicle for an entirely different purpose.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 3 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 7 hours ago