FSC warns on super caps
Just days out from the Federal Budget, the Financial Services Council (FSC) has utilised actuarial research from Mercer to argue against any lowering in concessional superannuation caps.
The FSC/Mercer research warns that the Government may actually be placing a greater cost on the Budget if it opts to reduce the concessional superannuation cap from its $30,000 level down to $20,000.
The research cites the example of a female employee earning an income of $65,000 for 10 years from age 20 to 30 and who then takes a 10-year break before returning to the workforce at $65,000.
The scenario then suggests that at age 45, the woman is promoted with their income increasing to $80,000 before they are promoted again at age 50 with their income increasing to $100,000.
It said the woman's higher income allowed them to first pay down their family home and then salary sacrifice $20,000 a year into their superannuation from age 50 to their retirement at 67 years.
Under the current $30,000 super cap, the FSC/Mercer analysis projects a super balance of $992,000 and an age pension of $44,000 while under a $20,000 cap, it projects a super balance of $760,000, and an age pension of $119,000.
It said the total cost to Government would therefore be $11,000 higher under the reduced concessional contribution caps.
Recommended for you
The financial services technology firm has officially launched its digital advice and education solution for superannuation funds and other industry players.
The ETF provider has flagged a number of developments as it formally enters the superannuation space through a major acquisition.
While all MySuper products successfully passed the latest performance test, trustee-directed products encountered difficulties.
Iress has appointed Insignia Financial’s former general manager of master trust and insurance products as its newest CEO of superannuation, who will take over from Paul Giles.
