Fraud compensation leaves SMSFs out in the cold

SMSFs/self-managed-superannuation-funds/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/self-managed-super-fund/SPAA/financial-ombudsman-service/government/chairman/director/

14 April 2011
| By Ashleigh McIntyre |
image
image
expand image

The collapse of Trio Capital and the subsequent lack of financial assistance for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) has revealed a gaping hole in the compensation safety net for SMSF investors.

This has prompted calls by the Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) to set up a compensation scheme, similar to that of large super funds, to cover instances of fraud.

In Tuesday’s announcement, the Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, announced that only funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) would be eligible for compensation.

The $55 million of financial assistance will be funded by way of a levy on all APRA-regulated funds, which will then be distributed to the funds whose members require compensation.

But the 690 direct investors, of which 285 are SMSFs, were told they would not be eligible for compensation as there was no compensation scheme set up for these investors.

Instead, they were told to consider contacting the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Shorten was quoted as saying: “If people wish not to operate under those SMSF regulations, they’re free to become members of the APRA funds.”

SPAA chairman Sharyn Long (pictured) acknowledged that SMSF investors had more control than those in large super funds.

“However, this does not mean SMSF members should be forced to turn to a potentially protracted and expensive court process to seek redress in cases of fraud,” Long said.

Small Independent Superannuation Funds Association (SISFA) director Andrew Cullinan said he felt disappointed by the decision to exclude SMSFs from compensation.

“The basis for exclusion seems to be because they have a direct control over their investment base,” he said.

“It’s splitting hairs. People have to invest their superannuation somewhere, whether it is a mainstream fund or a SMSF, so that’s the choice you have to make.”

He said that if the Government made a decision to compensate, it should cover all those involved, regardless of the vehicle they were investing through.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS