Fraud compensation leaves SMSFs out in the cold

SMSFs self-managed superannuation funds australian prudential regulation authority self-managed super fund SPAA financial ombudsman service government chairman director

14 April 2011
| By Ashleigh McIntyre |
image
image
expand image

The collapse of Trio Capital and the subsequent lack of financial assistance for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) has revealed a gaping hole in the compensation safety net for SMSF investors.

This has prompted calls by the Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) to set up a compensation scheme, similar to that of large super funds, to cover instances of fraud.

In Tuesday’s announcement, the Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, announced that only funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) would be eligible for compensation.

The $55 million of financial assistance will be funded by way of a levy on all APRA-regulated funds, which will then be distributed to the funds whose members require compensation.

But the 690 direct investors, of which 285 are SMSFs, were told they would not be eligible for compensation as there was no compensation scheme set up for these investors.

Instead, they were told to consider contacting the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Shorten was quoted as saying: “If people wish not to operate under those SMSF regulations, they’re free to become members of the APRA funds.”

SPAA chairman Sharyn Long (pictured) acknowledged that SMSF investors had more control than those in large super funds.

“However, this does not mean SMSF members should be forced to turn to a potentially protracted and expensive court process to seek redress in cases of fraud,” Long said.

Small Independent Superannuation Funds Association (SISFA) director Andrew Cullinan said he felt disappointed by the decision to exclude SMSFs from compensation.

“The basis for exclusion seems to be because they have a direct control over their investment base,” he said.

“It’s splitting hairs. People have to invest their superannuation somewhere, whether it is a mainstream fund or a SMSF, so that’s the choice you have to make.”

He said that if the Government made a decision to compensate, it should cover all those involved, regardless of the vehicle they were investing through.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS