Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Fix retirement incomes means testing or face policy failure

myretirement/superannuation/

20 September 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government must fix assets and incomes tests around retirement incomes or face the risk that its proposals to develop a MyRetirement product will flounder, according to the Actuaries Institute.

The institute has told the Government that unless it makes a determination on how such products are treated under the age pension means test, product development will not progress and innovation will stall.

The head of the Actuaries Institute’s Retirement Strategy Group and head of Willis Towers Watson Australasia, Andrew Boal said that if the Government failed to move on the issue and therefore failed to get the broad framework right, there was little chance of helping retirees to deal with longevity risk in retirement.

“There is an opportunity to make the retirement system more efficient, to establish the framework in which we can then debate all other post-retirement issues,” Boal said. “But the industry must first know how MyRetirement products will be dealt with under the Age Pension means tests.”

He pointed to the fact that the aim of MyRetirement products was to help retirees’ lift their living standards by addressing longevity risk and that risk pooling could help lift standard.

But Boal said there were very few markets where pooled mortality products were taken up in great numbers without some form of incentive, or compulsion.  

He said that while the Government had removed some of barriers to the development of innovative retirement products by extending the tax exemption on earnings during retirement to products such as deferred lifetime and annuities and group self-annuitisation products, there had been no policy announcement relating to the means test treatment of the products.

“It is the missing piece in the jigsaw puzzle to improve the efficiency of the superannuation system,” Boal said.  “Without some sort of beneficial ruling, it may not be commercially viable for providers to develop the sort of innovative longevity protection products needed to help Australians lead a better life in retirement.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 22 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND