Family super fund members fined $50k over loans

federal court trustee

16 October 2014
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

 Members of a family superannuation fund have been fined for using the fund to provide rent-free accommodation to their son.

The Federal Court of Australia heard that the Graham Family Superannuation Fund made 80 unauthorised loans totalling $134,418.62 to Ian Christopher Graham and Carolyn Ann Graham between 11 July 2008 and 30 June 2012.

The Court was told that the loans caused the market value ratio of the fund’s in-house assets to exceed the five per cent limit on in-house assets.

Court documents revealed that the Graham Family Superannuation Fund was established in October 2006, with Carolyn Graham rolling over $216,047.43 into it from an existing super fund in July 2007, while Ian Graham added a further $273,113.15 through the rollover of an existing fund in August 2007.

On 20 July 2007 the trustee contracted to purchase a residential property for $285,408.92, which was leased to the fund members’ son fully furnished until 4 February 2013. However, rent was not paid as required by the lease and by 30 June 2013 the arrears were $60,762.

The Court also heard that the fund was used to fund the purchases of a caravan and two motor vehicles – which were garaged with two adult sons of the Grahams’ – with the fund also paying for insurance, registration and maintenance of the purchases from which no income was derived by the fund.

Between September 2007 and September 2009, the trustee also expended $56,226.50 on the purchase of stud cattle for a livestock business conducted by the Grahams, with a further $6.736 was spent from the fund on insurance, registration fees, veterinary costs and other expenses, which again did not produce income for the fund.

In a submission to the court, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Superannuation) said “the contraventions were serious, numerous, varied as to their particulars and sustained”.

The court issued fines totalling $40,000 plus costs, with Ian Graham ordered to pay $30,000, while Carolyn Graham was fined $10,000, and that each should be responsible for half the agreed costs of $10,000.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 1 hour ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 15 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

19 hours 44 minutes ago