Faced by ASIC questioning ISA changes its early access super calculations

superannuation ISA industry super australia ME Bank ASIC

13 May 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In the face of a formal letter from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Industry funds advocacy group Industry Super Australia (ISA) has changed its modelling around the impact of people obtaining early access to superannuation.

Just days out from ISA executives being forced to front a Parliamentary Committee, ASIC has revealed it wrote to Industry Super Australia late last month “asking questions about the modelling underlying their estimates of the impact of early release of superannuation on retirement balances”.

However, ASIC has yet to decide what, if anything, it is going to do about ISA.

ASIC said that in its letter to ISA, the regulator had “expressed concern that the ISA modelling did not follow all of the principles that ASIC articulated in a frequently asked question published on ASIC’s website on 16 April, 2020: How should trustees communicate the potential long-term impacts of the COVID-19 early release of superannuation scheme on retirement balances?”.

“Contrary to the ASIC principles, the ISA modelling did not use the same assumptions as the generic calculator on the ISA website. (The ASIC principles are intended to assist trustees by describing how they might minimise their risk of providing misleading disclosure. It is important to note that they do not have the force of law and estimates are not misleading merely because they do not comply with the ASIC principles.),” the ASIC answer said.

“On 4 May ISA responded to ASIC’s letter stating that it had reviewed its early release modelling and website calculators and that, as a result of that review, it would make changes to the assumptions used in its early release modelling and website calculators,” it said.

“ASIC is reviewing ISA’s changes and will then consider its next steps,” ASIC’s answer said.

However in a positive note for ISA, ASIC said it had noted that contrary to the original evidence provided to the COVID-19 Senate Select Committee by Treasury official, Robert Jeremenko, the ISA estimates were “in real, rather than nominal dollars and this is not the focus of ASIC’s engagement with ISA on this matter”.

Both ISA executives and those from industry funds-owned bank, ME Bank, have been directed to attend a special hearing of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics this week.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 8 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 6 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 9 hours ago