Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Don't get caught out by SMSF property development

property/SMSFs/ATO/smsf-essentials/self-managed-super-funds/financial-advisers/self-managed-super-fund/australian-taxation-office/money-management/trustee/

29 March 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office's (ATO's) view on property development in self-managed super funds (SMSF) is not straightforward, and financial advisers need to ensure that SMSF members use funds as a retirement vehicle rather than to conduct business, said Peter Hogan, MLC Technical.

Speaking at Money Management's SMSF Essentials 2012, Hogan said the ATO's view on SMSF investments including listed securities and managed funds is clear-cut, but legislation regarding property development and business activity depends on circumstances and varying criteria. 

"One of the things that is clear is just because the trustee of your fund or your client carries on some activities which have a businesslike feel to them, doesn't mean they're going to fail the sole purpose test on carrying on a business," Hogan said.

He said criteria include the scale of the activity, the profit motive and the financial impact on the fund, as well as considerations about whether the property is developed for rental or sale.

A simple view of the issue pits members who develop property for rental as passive investors, while those who develop for sale breach the sole purpose test, he said.

"This is one area where your clients can fall over the line if they're not careful in terms of how they address this," Hogan said. 

"There are people talking to your SMSF clients all the time about using their superfund money to be a passive investor in property development, and they're corking up structures and cooking up arrangements in order to encourage them to do that," he said.

But financial advisers need to navigate the 'grey' to ensure their clients' SMSFs don't breach ATO regulations, Hogan said.

"On balance, the ATO's view is carrying on a business, and those businesslike activities are inconsistent with the sole purpose test, so if you go down that path too enthusiastically, the ATO says you can do it, but you won't be a self-managed super fund anymore and you lose your tax concessions," he said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND