Don’t be prescriptive on SMSF warnings, says FSC

FSC SMSFs ATO ASIC compliance financial services council australian taxation office adviser australian securities and investments commission superannuation industry trustee government

25 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Advisers should warn their self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) clients about the lack of compensation arrangements associated with this type of investment vehicle, but any prescriptive warnings should be avoided, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).

In its submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) Consultation Paper 216 — Advice on SMSF: Specific disclosure requirements and SMSF costs — the FSC questioned whether multiple warnings in different formats using different wording on a variety of forms would be useful for the consumer.

The Council had noted the previous Government's proposal for the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to include additional warnings that SMSF members are not eligible for compensation.

However, the submission questions ASIC's intention to consult on requiring advisers to warn the clients themselves.

"It is neither efficient nor sensible in requiring the client to sign off on the warning twice," the submission, written by FSC's senior policy manager Cecilia Storniolo, read.

The client is to sign off on the ATO Trustee Declaration form acknowledging the warning, it said.

"Further, an adviser has substantially enhanced conduct and disclosure obligations as a result of FOFA that compel [them] to have considered the client's needs and wants and provided advice that was in the best interests of the client, and that in documenting that advice, an adviser would not proceed to implement the advice they have provided the client until the client has understood the advice and authorised the adviser to proceed to implement the advice."

As such, the client will have been warned by the adviser and the client will have signed a document which contains the warning, the FSC said.

The Council is supportive of the adviser warning the client of the fact their prospective SMSF would not be protected by the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act compensation scheme.

"We are not supportive of prescriptive warnings nor of any additional and/or separate document (including disclosure inclusion in the Statement of Advice) to be signed by the client to confirm they have understood as being useful tools to aid consumer understanding."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 21 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 12 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago