Does member interest trump investment expertise?
Investment expertise should be secondary to alignment with members’ interests when appointing directors to superannuation fund boards, according to academic and former senior adviser to the Super System, Dr Wilson Sy.
In a submission to the Productivity Commission (PC) review on Superannuation Efficiency and Competitiveness, Sy accused the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) of holding an erroneous view on superannuation governance because the regulator supported proposed Government amendments to require a minimum of one-third independent directors and an independent chair on superannuation boards.
Sy’s submission claimed the proposed legislation “would wrongly prioritise the importance of investment expertise in directors ahead of their alignment of interests with members”.
In doing so, he said the Hayne Royal Commission had recently provided many examples of highly skilled retail fund directors who had unlawfully damaged the interests of superannuation members.
Sy’s submission also stated that, over long periods, retail funds with most “independent” directors had performed significantly worse on a consistent, persistent and predictable basis relative to other superannuation funds which have few, if any, “independent” directors.
Recommended for you
The financial services technology firm has officially launched its digital advice and education solution for superannuation funds and other industry players.
The ETF provider has flagged a number of developments as it formally enters the superannuation space through a major acquisition.
While all MySuper products successfully passed the latest performance test, trustee-directed products encountered difficulties.
Iress has appointed Insignia Financial’s former general manager of master trust and insurance products as its newest CEO of superannuation, who will take over from Paul Giles.
