Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Dealing with self-managed super, death and divorce

trustee/financial-planners/best-interests/

1 September 2003
| By Julie Bennett |

David Shirlow’s tip for financial planners working on estate plans for divorced clients is to ensure those clients make binding or non-lapsing nominations on their superannuation, particularly in situations where they have remarried and have children from both marriages.

Shirlow, the head of technical services for Macquarie Financial Services, says the first thing an adviser needs to do in relation to the client’s super is to identify who will have the decision on how the superannuation benefit is to be paid, following the client’s death.

If the decision is to be made by an arm’s length trustee, that trustee will usually write to all the potential beneficiaries indicating how the benefit will be paid. Those people have the opportunity to agree or disagree, but if they fail to respond they will have no recourse to the Superannuation Tribunal.

Shirlow estimates that 25 per cent of cases currently before the tribunal relate to disputes over how the benefit will be paid.

The other area for concern, according to Shirlow, is self-managed superannuation, whereby the current surviving spouse is likely to be the trustee of the fund. If there are children who are not related to that surviving spouse, that spouse might have a conflict of interest.

“The spouse, who is both trustee and member of the SMSF, may not act in the best interests of the family,” he says.

The only way clients can exercise any real control from the grave is to make a binding nomination — and that nomination needs to be reviewed whenever the client’s circumstances change.

“The best time to do this is when the client is coming to an agreement on how the super is to be split following the breakdown of the marriage,” Shirlow says.

“Some binding nominations hold fast even post divorce, as incidentally, do some wills.

“If the binding nomination was made in favour of the ex-spouse and the client has not changed that nomination following the divorce, the superannuation benefit may well pass to the ex-spouse.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 19 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND