Concessional caps’ sweet spot around $50,000

financial planning fixed interest funds management ASFA chief executive government chief investment officer superannuation funds federal budget retirement savings age pension money management

10 July 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The sustainability and retirement sweet spot for concessional contribution caps is close to that which prevailed in 2007 with the Government's current settings still far too low, according to a panel of senior superannuation executives.

The panel, part of a breakfast hosted by Money Management's sister publication Super Review and CommInsure, was asked what represented the sweet spot with respect to concessional contribution caps,with all of them agreeing that it was certainly higher than the $35,000 announced in the Federal Budget.

The concessional contribution caps stood at $50,000 in 2007 and were then progressively reduced down to $25,000 in Government's 2012 Budget — something which the panel agreed was too low to meet the needs of pre-retirees looking to top up their superannuation before they finished their working lives.

Economist and chief investment officer at Mosaic Portfolio Adviser, Matt Drennan, said he believed the cap needed to be lifted to help retirees meet adequacy in retirement, while Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia chief executive, Pauline Vamos, said her organisation had been very specific about the need to lift the caps.

The panel was also in agreement on the desirability of limits being placed on the extent to which retirees could access retirement lump sums, with LG Super chief executive Peter Lambert strongly supporting the encouragement of income stream-type products.

Vamos said this was consistent with the recommendations contained in an ASFA white paper, which found that while access to a lump sum up to a certain level was appropriate to meet various capital expenditure and other immediate needs of a retiree, there should be limits on the amount that could be withdrawn.

The white paper further argued that the tax treatment of lump sums should be less favourable than for a benefit taken as an income stream.

She said the white paper had noted that this would encourage individuals not to substantially run down their retirement savings prior to becoming eligible for the Age Pension.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

6 days 23 hours ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

4 days 17 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS