Committee backs Govt’s super objective

"financial-planning"/"funds-management"/

16 February 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The claimed failure of key stakeholders to develop a consensus around adequacy being a key component of the objective of superannuation has seen a majority of the Senate Economics Committee back the Government's legislation that the objective of super should be to supplement the Age Pension.

While Australian Labor Party members of the committee issued a dissenting report calling on the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer to withdraw the legislation until it is fixed, the majority report backed the Government's position.

It based its backing on there being "no consensus position for the introduction of subjective descriptors such as ‘adequate' or ‘comfortable' ".

"There was no consensus position for the introduction of subjective descriptors," the committee report said.

"The committee therefore considers that the objective as drafted will enhance the stability of the superannuation system by creating a clear framework for assessing superannuation policy."

It said that the committee did not consider that either a relative or absolute level of retirement income should be included in the primary or subsidiary objectives.

"Indeed, the subjective nature of terms such as ‘adequacy', ‘comfort', and ‘dignity' have the potential to undermine the successful implementation of an objective for the superannuation system by focusing on retirement incomes as a whole," the report said.

"While there may be merit in striving to set an objective for the entire retirement income system, this is the not the purpose of the bill under consideration by the committee."

Labor members of the committee strongly disagreed with the findings of the reporting, pointing out that "there is overwhelming opposition to the government's current proposed objective".

"Key stakeholders including the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), Industry Super Australia (ISA), the Financial Services Council (FSC), the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), and the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) criticised the government's lack of consultation during the inquiry and raised concerns with the objective as it is currently proposed," the Labor senators said.

"The minister needs to withdraw this bill, undertake genuine and detailed consultation with the industry stakeholders and work constructively with Labor to satisfy the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) recommendation to reach broad political agreement for the objective.

"Labor supports legislating an objective for super and we are ready to work constructively with the government to achieve this goal," they said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS