X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Expert Resources
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the Money Management bulletin
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News Superannuation

CGT concession pitfalls for retiring business owners

by Graeme Colley
June 18, 2013
in News, Superannuation
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

There are pitfalls in selling a business and moving to retirement, as Graeme Colley writes.

It was former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser who famously (or infamously) said that life wasn’t meant to be easy.

X

Well, when it comes to small business owners attempting to maximise the capital gains tax (CGT) concessions, those words are prophetic.

The sad reality is that some business owners who are nearing retirement fail to understand the complexity surrounding the eligibility criteria for these CGT concessions and end up paying a high price. Indeed, in the case I am about to cite, a very high price.

But first things first; these concessions are generous, and if properly utilised are an important tool for business owners planning to retire.

They can be used to transfer business property into self-managed super funds (SMSFs) tax free, and can also allow small business owners to make tax-free contributions to their SMSF when they sell business assets. 

That’s the good news.

Where business owners slip up is by failing to appreciate that the provisions in Division 152 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (especially the eligibility criteria for the concessions) are complex, and that the conditions that need to be satisfied to secure the CGT small business concessions must be met just before the relevant CGT event occurs – usually just before the sale or disposal of the relevant asset.

Among these conditions are the small business entity test, the maximum net asset value test, the significant individual test, and the active asset test.

A case in point

To illustrate how it can all go pear-shaped, a recent Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) case (Confidential and Commissioner of Taxation [2013] AATA 76) highlighted the adverse outcome for a small business owner where poor timing when selling an asset increased the taxable income by more than $700,000.

Timing was everything in this case. The taxpayer was selling his share in a business entered into a Heads of Agreement for sale on 7 August 2008, and the final contract of sale for the business was executed just over four months later on 19 December 2008. 

The taxpayer used the CGT discount and small business concessions to reduce the $704,129 capital gain made from the business sale to zero.

However, the ATO amended the taxpayer’s 2008-09 tax return to include the $704,129 capital gain in the taxpayer’s assessable income on the basis that the taxpayer did not qualify for the CGT small business concessions.

The Commissioner of Taxation contended that the taxpayer did not satisfy the conditions to access the small business concessions at the time of the CGT event, which the Commissioner viewed as being when the Heads of Agreement was finalised, and the AAT upheld the Commissioner’s decision. Why?

The AAT contended that the CGT event happened at the time the Heads of Agreement was executed because of the following:

  • The terms left little scope for doubt that the parties agreed to the sale and purchase of the business;
  • It included a schedule detailing the terms and conditions of the sale; and
  • It expressly stated that the parties agreed to be bound by the terms of the document.

There are two obvious lessons here for small business owners about to sell up and enter retirement.

First, the importance of being fully across all the details of a taxpayer’s arrangements when dealing with the CGT small business concessions – even those that might be taken for granted, such as the date of a sale.

As I noted, the difference of four months in the sale of the small business made a significant difference to the taxpayer’s final tax outcome. 

Second, there is the need to get professional advice. Advisers can help clients qualify for the CGT concessions by:

  • Checking and structuring their clients’ affairs to make sure they are eligible for the CGT small business concessions; and
  • Seeking legal advice to make sure that Heads of Agreement do not form a binding contract for sale.

Graeme Colley is the director of education professional standards at the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA).

Tags: Administrative Appeals TribunalATOCapital GainsDirectorIncome TaxSMSFsSPAATaxation

Related Posts

Concerns high as education deadline approaches

by Shy-Ann Arkinstall
December 23, 2025

Less than two weeks out from 2026, the profession is waiting to see what the total adviser loss will be...

AFSLs warned against unfair contracts

The biggest financial advice M&A of Q4

by Laura Dew
December 23, 2025

In a year of consolidation and rationalisation, Money Management collates the biggest M&A in financial advice from the final three...

Janus Henderson acquired in US$7.4 billion deal

by Laura Dew
December 23, 2025

Global asset manager Janus Henderson has been acquired by Trian Fund Management and General Catalyst in a US$7.4 billion deal....

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Consistency is the most underrated investment strategy.

In financial markets, excitement drives headlines. Equity markets rise, fall, and recover — creating stories that capture attention. Yet sustainable...

by Industry Expert
November 5, 2025
Promoted Content

Jonathan Belz – Redefining APAC Access to US Private Assets

Winner of Executive of the Year – Funds Management 2025After years at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse, Jonathan Belz founded...

by Staff Writer
September 11, 2025
Promoted Content

Real-Time Settlement Efficiency in Modern Crypto Wealth Management

Cryptocurrency liquidity has become a cornerstone of sophisticated wealth management strategies, with real-time settlement capabilities revolutionizing traditional investment approaches. The...

by PartnerArticle
September 4, 2025
Editorial

Relative Return: How fixed income got its defensiveness back

In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Roy Keenan, co-head of fixed income at Yarra Capital...

by Laura Dew
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Podcasts

Relative Return Insider: MYEFO, US data and a 2025 wrap up

December 18, 2025

Relative Return Insider: RBA holds, Fed cuts and Santa’s set to rally

December 11, 2025

Relative Return Insider: GDP rebounds and housing squeeze getting worse

December 5, 2025

Relative Return Insider: US shares rebound, CPI spikes and super investment

November 28, 2025

Relative Return Insider: Economic shifts, political crossroads, and the digital future

November 14, 2025

Relative Return: Helping Australians retire with confidence

November 11, 2025

Top Performing Funds

FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3 y p.a(%)
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
211.38
2
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund Hedged
110.90
3
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.11
4
Smarter Money Long-Short Credit Investor USD
67.63
5
BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF
62.68
Money Management provides accurate, informative and insightful editorial coverage of the Australian financial services market, with topics including taxation, managed funds, property investments, shares, risk insurance, master trusts, superannuation, margin lending, financial planning, portfolio construction, and investment strategies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Financial Planning
  • Funds Management
  • Investment Insights
  • ETFs
  • People & Products
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Superannuation

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
    • All News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • All Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • ETFs
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
  • Features
    • All Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
  • Expert Resources
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited