Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Call to open up infrastructure investment to SMSFs

SMSF/infrastructure/

5 November 2015
| By Jayson Forrest |
image
image image
expand image

With Government attention firmly focused on how to raise the billions of dollars required to meet Australia's growing infrastructure needs, now was the "opportune time" to open up infrastructure investment to the SMSF sector. This was the view of SMSF Association chief executive officer, Andrea Slattery.

According to Slattery, although the SMSF sector has nearly $600 billion in funds under management (FUM), it is barred from investing in infrastructure.

"This is despite the fact that infrastructure assets have an obvious attraction for SMSF trustees who are looking for long-term investment horizons and healthy yields in a low rate environment," said Slattery.

The SMSF Association believes there are currently three main factors inhibiting direct SMSF investment in infrastructure. They are:

  • The high costs involved in infrastructure investing. With the average SMSF with just over $1 million in FUM, investing in infrastructure was the domain of institutional investors;
  • Illiquidity. SMSF trustees need to be able to trade their holding quickly if market conditions or financial circumstances change; and
  • The high entry and expensive ongoing management fees that infrastructure investments can attract.

Slattery said while these issues have proved an "insurmountable barrier to entry" in the past, there was no logical reason why this had to be the case.

"Options include offering unitised investments in smaller parcels (our recommended figure is $25,000) or infrastructure bonds," she said. "Another possibility is ASX-listed infrastructure funds."

Slattery added that another attraction for SMSF trustees was the risk profile of some infrastructure assets. While she conceded that greenfield projects came with higher risk, and may require some form of government-backed guarantee, at least in the early stages, established infrastructure (brownfield) has a risk profile that typically sits between cash and fixed interest and property and equities.

"For trustees, particularly in the pension phase, it offers both a degree of security and potentially higher yields than what they can currently get from cash or term deposits," Slattery said. "Indeed, the income from this asset class could be used to fund income streams in retirement — a type of annuity."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND