Board independence doesn’t equal performance

boards independent directors superannuation

16 March 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

There is little empirical evidence to suggest that board member independence in the superannuation system would boost investment performance but it could contribute to maintaining the legitimacy of the super system, a new study suggested.

The Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR) released a study, which said that the ‘evidence' of improved investment performance from good governance in the super and pension sector relies mainly on the higher cost structures sometimes evident where trustees employ related parties to help with the administration of the fund.

However, Dr Scott Donald from the University of New South Wales, who authored the study with Suzanne Le Mire of the University of Adelaide, said the lack of evidence of superior investment performance should not mean the idea of independence should be dismissed.

The absence of evidence (in either direction) should not, however, be seen as fatal as independence does support good decision making which is essential in superannuation governance," Dr Donald said.

"Independence also offers a number of other potential advantages that have not been fully explored in the superannuation debate. This includes the potential to enhance legitimacy of a system in which stakeholders are forced to participate but in which they may feel under-prepared or disempowered."

The paper concluded that the government should formulate a more sophisticated, nuanced, and more compelling argument justifying the establishment of structural independence on super fund boards than it has in the past as this could contribute positively to enhancing decision processes.

One of the approaches that should be taken when regulating for independence is imposing specific structural barriers that spot and forbid connections that could threaten or be inconsistent with independence in order to ensure independence.

But the paper warned it would be difficult to identify potentially threatening relationships, and the appointed person's independence may become questionable only after their appointment.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 5 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 4 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

6 days 15 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

5 days 19 hours ago