Blame lower caps, not property spruikers

property funds management government and regulation self-managed superannuation funds SPAA SMSFs smsf trustees smsf professionals SMSF government chief executive financial adviser

2 October 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Government's lowering of concessional contribution caps has had more to do with people opting for negative gearing outside of super than the siren call of property spruikers, according to SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery.

She said SPAA research had shown that the lower concessional caps had prompted the move to negative gearing outside of super, yet there had been little response from regulators and little discussion of the damage such moves were causing to Government revenue.

"It seems to us at SPAA that any train wreck will most likely occur there, and for one simple reason. "SMSF [self-managed superannuation funds] trustees, if they seek advice on any investment, require advice from a licensed financial adviser to assess whether the investment is appropriate to the circumstances of the fund and its members," Slattery said.

"Individuals don't require professional advice to consider their particular circumstances before they invest in geared property, suggesting these investments pose a higher risk compared with SMSFs, where far stricter protocols are in place."

In a column to SPAA members published this week, Slattery cited recent commentary by the regulators and the Reserve Bank suggesting that SMSFs were, potentially, a vehicle for speculative demand for residential property.

However she said that it would be wrong to suggest that property was an inappropriate investment for SMSFs.

"We have constantly warned that SMSFs must approach property, like all investments, armed with the best professional advice," Slattery said. "Property is not an inappropriate investment per se; but it must be appropriate to the fund and consider the member's circumstances, just like all investments."

She said that where SPAA strongly disagreed with regulators and critics of the sector was in the suggestion that SMSF trustees were "listening to the siren call of the property spruikers and gearing up to rush headlong into unsuitable residential property investments".

"The figures don't bear this out," Slattery said. "At June 30, property assets in SMSFs stood at $75 billion, of which $58 billion was mostly commercial; $17 billion was residential. With total assets at $495 billion, it means residential property comprises 3.4 per cent of all SMSF assets."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 day 5 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

5 days 11 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 days 9 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

3 days 12 hours ago