Blame lower caps, not property spruikers
The Government's lowering of concessional contribution caps has had more to do with people opting for negative gearing outside of super than the siren call of property spruikers, according to SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery.
She said SPAA research had shown that the lower concessional caps had prompted the move to negative gearing outside of super, yet there had been little response from regulators and little discussion of the damage such moves were causing to Government revenue.
"It seems to us at SPAA that any train wreck will most likely occur there, and for one simple reason. "SMSF [self-managed superannuation funds] trustees, if they seek advice on any investment, require advice from a licensed financial adviser to assess whether the investment is appropriate to the circumstances of the fund and its members," Slattery said.
"Individuals don't require professional advice to consider their particular circumstances before they invest in geared property, suggesting these investments pose a higher risk compared with SMSFs, where far stricter protocols are in place."
In a column to SPAA members published this week, Slattery cited recent commentary by the regulators and the Reserve Bank suggesting that SMSFs were, potentially, a vehicle for speculative demand for residential property.
However she said that it would be wrong to suggest that property was an inappropriate investment for SMSFs.
"We have constantly warned that SMSFs must approach property, like all investments, armed with the best professional advice," Slattery said. "Property is not an inappropriate investment per se; but it must be appropriate to the fund and consider the member's circumstances, just like all investments."
She said that where SPAA strongly disagreed with regulators and critics of the sector was in the suggestion that SMSF trustees were "listening to the siren call of the property spruikers and gearing up to rush headlong into unsuitable residential property investments".
"The figures don't bear this out," Slattery said. "At June 30, property assets in SMSFs stood at $75 billion, of which $58 billion was mostly commercial; $17 billion was residential. With total assets at $495 billion, it means residential property comprises 3.4 per cent of all SMSF assets."
Recommended for you
Unveiling its performance for the calendar year 2024, AMP has noted a “careful” investment in bitcoin futures proved beneficial for its superannuation members.
SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positive” returns.
The second tranche of DBFO reforms has received strong support from superannuation funds and insurers, with a new class of advisers aimed to support Australians with their retirement planning.
The financial services technology firm has officially launched its digital advice and education solution for superannuation funds and other industry players.
