Bipartisan accord needed on super

taxation government and regulation chief executive government money management chairman

5 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Three senior superannuation fund executives have called on the major political parties to adopt a bipartisan approach to superannuation policy in the interests of restoring member confidence.

A roundtable conducted by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, saw Club Plus chief executive Paul Cahill and EIS Super chief executive Alex Hutchison both lament the Government's mixed signals around superannuation tax arrangements and call for a bipartisan policy approach.

NGS Super chairman Richard Shearman said he believed the less tinkering that occurred to superannuation the better.

However it was Hutchison and Cahill who signaled their strong concern at the fall-out being generated amongst members by statements from the Government on superannuation policy and possible changes to super taxation in the May Budget.

"The best approach, and the approach that our members have, is that they don't want to pay any more tax, ‘hands off' and have a consistent bipartisan approach, because if you don't have that I can only echo what other people have said in the last month or so: it's going to drive uncertainty into the system so that people then won't contribute into superannuation," Hutchison said.

Cahill agreed with Hutchison and said the uncertainty to which he referred was "live" in the Club Plus membership.

"We see it in our members. We've seen quite a few of our members just get spooked at the smell of a new, well I hate to say it, an almost rehashed RBL [Reasonable Benefits Limit] coming back in a different form," he said.

"A lot of people have just said, ‘what's going on here, I thought this was the understanding', and just this new process that they want to introduce has really frightened a lot of people," Cahill said.

"I was just thinking how we need to go back to the Hawke/Keating era of having an Accord. We need to have both sides of the Government, doesn't matter what political flavour you are, agree to leave us alone — because it just does so much damage in so many areas having people tinkering with the edges," he said.

"They might think it's a little adjustment of one point, but the ramifications are massive and in terms of the ripple effect — I don't think people understand how far it goes."

The full roundtable will be published in the March edition of Super Review.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 1 week ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 6 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 week ago