Bipartisan accord needed on super

taxation/government-and-regulation/chief-executive/government/money-management/chairman/

5 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Three senior superannuation fund executives have called on the major political parties to adopt a bipartisan approach to superannuation policy in the interests of restoring member confidence.

A roundtable conducted by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, saw Club Plus chief executive Paul Cahill and EIS Super chief executive Alex Hutchison both lament the Government's mixed signals around superannuation tax arrangements and call for a bipartisan policy approach.

NGS Super chairman Richard Shearman said he believed the less tinkering that occurred to superannuation the better.

However it was Hutchison and Cahill who signaled their strong concern at the fall-out being generated amongst members by statements from the Government on superannuation policy and possible changes to super taxation in the May Budget.

"The best approach, and the approach that our members have, is that they don't want to pay any more tax, ‘hands off' and have a consistent bipartisan approach, because if you don't have that I can only echo what other people have said in the last month or so: it's going to drive uncertainty into the system so that people then won't contribute into superannuation," Hutchison said.

Cahill agreed with Hutchison and said the uncertainty to which he referred was "live" in the Club Plus membership.

"We see it in our members. We've seen quite a few of our members just get spooked at the smell of a new, well I hate to say it, an almost rehashed RBL [Reasonable Benefits Limit] coming back in a different form," he said.

"A lot of people have just said, ‘what's going on here, I thought this was the understanding', and just this new process that they want to introduce has really frightened a lot of people," Cahill said.

"I was just thinking how we need to go back to the Hawke/Keating era of having an Accord. We need to have both sides of the Government, doesn't matter what political flavour you are, agree to leave us alone — because it just does so much damage in so many areas having people tinkering with the edges," he said.

"They might think it's a little adjustment of one point, but the ramifications are massive and in terms of the ripple effect — I don't think people understand how far it goes."

The full roundtable will be published in the March edition of Super Review.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo