ATO interpretive decision impacts step-children

SMSFs superannuation fund ATO superannuation fund members australian taxation office superannuation funds SMSF trustee

21 November 2011
| By Damon Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently released an interpretive decision which is highly relative to self-managed super fund (SMSF) succession planning, according to Bryce Figot, senior associate for DBA Lawyers.

The interpretive decision, ATO ID 2011/77, considers when a stepchild ceases to be a child of a stepparent and, more particularly, answers the question of whether a stepparent's superannuation death benefits may be paid to a stepchild if the stepparent is divorced from the stepchild's biological parent before death.

According to Figot, the ATO's position is that a stepchild ceases to be a dependant after the divorce, but he added that such a position had a number of important implications.

"Firstly, remember that an ATO ID is not the law," he said. "However, assuming that the view in ATO ID 2011/77 is correct (which DBA Lawyers believes it to be), the most obvious implication is that superannuation fund trustees typically may not pay out a deceased stepparent's superannuation death benefits to a stepchild where divorce has occurred.

"This implication gives rise to a subsequent, less obvious, implication," Figot continued. "Namely, non-biological children of superannuation fund members typically cease being beneficiaries of the fund upon divorce."

Figot said that it may surprise many to learn that such a scenario was often very positive news for superannuation funds.

"Remember that the beneficiaries of a superannuation fund are much broader than the members," he said. "Further, beneficiaries have various rights, such as compelling proper administration of the fund by the trustee, having the trustees act in good faith and inspecting trust documents, including the governing rules (eg, the trust deed) and trust accounts.

"Accordingly, children of a member's former spouse can't use such rights to make a nuisance of themselves [or use them as leverage in a family law property settlement negotiation]."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

1 week 2 days ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week ago