ASIC raises absence of ‘best interests’ obligation for employers

ASIC/productivity-commission/PC/superannuation/

9 August 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Employers are not required to act in employees’ best interests when selecting a default superannuation fund and this creates an environment where conflicts arise, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

In a submission filed with the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into superannuation efficiency and competitiveness ASIC has pointed to the fact that no offence is committed and there is no specified penalty when employers are found to be accepting inducements from superannuation funds.

“There are some limited provisions regulated by ASIC that have the aim of ensuring that employers make good decisions by addressing possible conflicts of interest. However, in ASIC’s experience (and as ASIC has publicly noted), these are of limited effect,” the submission said.

It said that, in particular, the prohibition on inducements by superannuation funds to employers under the relevant legislation did “not result in the commission of an offence nor the subsequent imposition of a penalty, and only gives rise to the creation of a statutory right for an aggrieved individual to commence a civil proceeding for the recovery of losses”.

“Employers also have consumer protections as a result of being deemed to be ‘retail clients’ for the purposes of receiving financial advice in relation to choosing a superannuation default fund,” ASIC said.

The regulator said that while it was the interests of employees not employers that was important in this context, the protections relating to financial advice on default fund selection did not directly impact those most affected by the advice – the employees.

“Furthermore, many employers will not obtain financial advice,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS