ASFA warns of moral hazard in APRA levy

ASFA ASIC superannuation funds australian taxation office australian prudential regulation authority australian securities and investments commission association of superannuation funds

9 January 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A moral hazard may flow from funding financial services regulators such the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) by way of a levy, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

The warning of the potential for moral hazard has come at the same time as ASFA has noted that the total cost of financial services supervisory levies in the current financial year has risen from $134 million to over $180 million.

In a submission filed as part of an Australia National Audit Office review of such arrangements, ASFA made clear it believed there needed to be greater accountability with respect to the justification for the levies and the manner in which they were used.

It said this accountability was necessary in circumstances where the quantum of the levies would have otherwise been attributed to superannuation fund member accounts.

On the question of moral hazard, its submission said that it evolved from "the party which is providing the funding (industry) having no control over the resourcing decisions made by the agency".

"This extends to the type, and in particular the scope, of activities engaged in by the agency and the quantum, and nature, of the resources used," the submission said.

"As such, there is little in the way of effective oversight, checks and balances and controls to ensure that the activities performed, the resourcing utilised and the resultant costs incurred are appropriate and reasonable," it said.

The submission argued that the usual process with respect to funding required rigour which necessitated having to perform a cost/benefit analysis and preparing a business case, "thereby imposing a fiscal discipline on the party concerned".

"If costs can simply be recovered by the imposition of a levy, the agency is relatively unconstrained as to the approach it can take, the scope and size of any project/activity and accordingly the costs it incurs," the ASFA submission said.

"Accordingly, the industry holds significant concerns about the absence of information with respect to the costs being recovered by the levies," it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS