ASFA finds flaws in Govt’s super tax assumptions

treasury taxation government and regulation association of superannuation funds superannuation funds superannuation fund ASFA capital gains government

20 February 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has used its pre-Budget submission to question the underlying Treasury assumptions behind the Government's proposals to alter the superannuation tax settings.

The submission, released late yesterday, claims there are "two serious conceptual shortcomings in the Treasury analysis" — with the estimate on the cost of tax concessions being based on investment earnings outside of superannuation, and with an incorrect assumption being made about how long people remain upper-income earners.

"The tax concession estimate is calculated on the basis that investment earnings outside

of superannuation would be taxed like interest from a bank account," the submission said. "The reality is that investment earnings outside of superannuation attract various concessions, including a 50 per cent discount on capital gains on assets held for more than 12 months. As a result

the Treasury figures overestimate the tax concession that flows from the concessional

treatment of investment earnings within a superannuation fund."

It then went on to claim that the more serious conceptual problem is that the Treasury analysis assumed that it was the same 1 or 5 per cent that stayed at the top of income distribution for a 37-year period from age 30 to 67.

"This is unrealistic and misleading," the submission said.

The submission said that ASFA supported the capping of concessional tax treatment of superannuation consistent with what might be reasonably needed for retirement income purposes, including what is needed to cope with future investment return uncertainty and with the financial consequences of longevity.

"Superannuation tax concessions should not extend to account balances which are being primarily used for estate planning," it said. "There is nothing wrong in itself with having a high superannuation account balance or other form of wealth; the relevant issue is whether such an account balance or wealth should attract a continuing tax concession."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 11 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS