Are unions blocking fund mergers for financial gain?

compliance/"conflicts-of-interest"/

2 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has used its submission to a Parliamentary Committee to claim that some union officials are blocking superannuation fund mergers to protect the revenue derived by unions from their seats on superannuation fund boards.

The claim is contained in the FSC's submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015 and specifically pointed to the failed merger between Equipsuper and VisionSuper.

It said that Equipsuper and Vision Super were finalising a merger to create a $10 billion superannuation fund with 160,000 members and that the two super funds had been in merger talks for three years and undertaken expensive due diligence.

"The merger was scheduled to be complete in July 2012," it said. "On the eve of the merger, however, Equipsuper pulled out. Equipsuper's Chair, Andrew Fairley, publicly cited Vision Super's sponsoring unions' and employer organisations' inability to reach agreement on the number of seats each would receive on the board of the merged entity as the major roadblock to the merger."

"Board seats are an important source of revenue and influence to sponsoring organisations. In many instances the salary paid to the board member is paid back to the sponsoring organisation and helps fund their day-to-day activities. Sponsoring organisations therefore have an incentive to put their own interests ahead of the interest of the fund member," the FSC submission said.

"Unfortunately for consumers, the current board composition of superannuation funds is preventing consolidation and can inhibit achieving economies of scale," it claimed. "Independent directors would be expected to take a critical look at the operating costs of subscale funds and assess whether those funds are viable over the longer term. Whilst it should be expected that all trustee directors would undertake such analysis, there are examples of directors of superannuation funds putting the interests of their sponsoring organisation ahead of the interests of consumers."

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 days 6 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5