Are unions blocking fund mergers for financial gain?

compliance/"conflicts-of-interest"/

2 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has used its submission to a Parliamentary Committee to claim that some union officials are blocking superannuation fund mergers to protect the revenue derived by unions from their seats on superannuation fund boards.

The claim is contained in the FSC's submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015 and specifically pointed to the failed merger between Equipsuper and VisionSuper.

It said that Equipsuper and Vision Super were finalising a merger to create a $10 billion superannuation fund with 160,000 members and that the two super funds had been in merger talks for three years and undertaken expensive due diligence.

"The merger was scheduled to be complete in July 2012," it said. "On the eve of the merger, however, Equipsuper pulled out. Equipsuper's Chair, Andrew Fairley, publicly cited Vision Super's sponsoring unions' and employer organisations' inability to reach agreement on the number of seats each would receive on the board of the merged entity as the major roadblock to the merger."

"Board seats are an important source of revenue and influence to sponsoring organisations. In many instances the salary paid to the board member is paid back to the sponsoring organisation and helps fund their day-to-day activities. Sponsoring organisations therefore have an incentive to put their own interests ahead of the interest of the fund member," the FSC submission said.

"Unfortunately for consumers, the current board composition of superannuation funds is preventing consolidation and can inhibit achieving economies of scale," it claimed. "Independent directors would be expected to take a critical look at the operating costs of subscale funds and assess whether those funds are viable over the longer term. Whilst it should be expected that all trustee directors would undertake such analysis, there are examples of directors of superannuation funds putting the interests of their sponsoring organisation ahead of the interests of consumers."

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo