Are super funds facing coronavirus liquidity issues?

12 March 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In circumstances where some major travel and hospitality industry employers have already announced they are asking staff to take both paid and unpaid leave while senior executives are taking pay cuts, questions are being asked about superannuation fund liquidity.

Liquidity issues arose for superannuation funds during the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007/08 but the impact of the coronavirus could be much more significant in circumstances where not only are superannuation funds holding illiquid assets but large numbers of members may be out of a job because of slow-downs in the travel, events and hospitality sectors but also the probability of large sporting events being postponed or deferred.

Rice Warner chief executive, Andrew Boal, said he believed that in such circumstances he believed that both superannuation fund trustees and the regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) would be closing monitoring the situation.

He said the issues warranting monitoring would be the level of illiquid assets held by affected funds and the impact on superannuation guarantee-generated cash flows if large numbers of workers ceased making contributions.

“I imagine that APRA will be closely monitoring that situation,” Boal said.

In the immediate aftermath of the GFC APRA took a close look at superannuation fund liquidity and implemented stress testing procedures but, as recently as 2016, lamented that not all trustees had taken the issue seriously enough.

However it warned against funds overlooking liquidity stating that “stresses that affect liquidity may not necessarily impact returns (or asset values) immediately”

“…in some circumstances, liquidity may be the most potentially severe risk faced by a superannuation fund in the short run – as occurred for some funds in the global financial crisis. Poor investment performance may ultimately lead to a failure to meet investment return objectives, and can lead to reduced confidence in the fund, but may not lead to a permanent loss of capital.”

“If it has inadequate liquidity, however, a superannuation fund could be forced to sell assets during a market downturn, thus crystallising losses. Furthermore, these losses could be more severe due to the adverse market impacts that are likely to be occurring at the same time.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

17 hours 48 minutes ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 3 days ago