APRA rebuffs ISA on fund governance

APRA/ISA/Governance/

21 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

In what represents a solid rebuff to Industry Super Australia (ISA) the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has fully backed the Government's move to impose at least one-third independent directors on superannuation fund boards, including an independent chairman.

What is more, APRA chose an industry funds forum — the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) Governance Ideas Exchange — to make its views entirely clear.

APRA member, Helen Rowell, used an address to the forum to rebuff ISA claims that the Government's governance changes would be detrimental, arguing that the existing equal representation regime had become less appropriate as industry superannuation funds had become public offer and their assets had grown to rival those of the major banks. 

"The superannuation industry has come a long way in the last 22 years. The superannuation guarantee arrangements are well and truly embedded and there has been a dramatic reduction in the number of corporate funds, which are now very much the minority," Rowell said. 

Further she pointed out that over 80 per cent of the assets of APRA-regulated superannuation funds were in public offer funds with a broad membership base and multiple (and in many cases hundreds or thousands of) employers contributing to the funds. 

"The industry's significance, from both a financial system and retirement income policy perspective, continues to increase. Indeed, the size of the industry and individual funds within it has increased significantly in recent years, with more and more funds having total assets comparable to larger deposit taking institutions (ADIs) and insurers," she said. 

Rowell said the boards of all ADIs and general and life insurers had been required by APRA's prudential standards to have a majority of independent directors and an independent chairperson since 2006. 

"And this applies —  and, I might add, works well —  even when the regulated entities are mutually-owned and not-for-profit," she said. 

"APRA's view is that, given the size, nature, and increasing complexity of the industry, it is appropriate for the governance requirements for the superannuation industry to be more closely aligned with those that apply to banking and insurance. After all, the industry is now an increasingly critical component of the Australian financial system."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo