APRA at odds with Coalition on independent directors
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signaled an important difference in view on superannuation fund governance to that expressed by the Federal Opposition and the Financial Services Council.
The regulator has declared it does not believe independent directors on superannuation funds need to be treated the same as those on publicly-listed financial services companies such as banks and insurance companies.
APRA deputy chairman Ross Jones told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds in Brisbane that independent directors on superannuation funds were not the same as those on banks and insurance products - and that the regulator would be treating them accordingly.
On the broader question of prudential standards and governance, Jones said that APRA's focus would be on board behaviours rather than structures.
He claimed the regulatory approach allowed APRA a measure of flexibility in looking at and dealing with super board behaviours.
"We don't care how you achieve the objectives so long as you know what the objectives are," he said.
Recommended for you
AMP is to launch a digital advice service to provide retirement advice to members of its AMP Super Fund, in partnership with Bravura Solutions.
Unveiling its performance for the calendar year 2024, AMP has noted a “careful” investment in bitcoin futures proved beneficial for its superannuation members.
SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positive” returns.
The second tranche of DBFO reforms has received strong support from superannuation funds and insurers, with a new class of advisers aimed to support Australians with their retirement planning.
