APRA confirms how early release surprised super funds

APRA wayne byres

4 December 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The degree to which the Government’s COVID-19 hardship superannuation early release scheme (ERS) impacted superannuation fund liquidity has again been referenced by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority – this time by the chair, Wayne Byres. 

Byres pointed the manner in which the usual steady stream of superannuation guarantee payments into superannuation funds had been quickly and unexpectedly undermined by the ERS arrangements. 

His comments to a risk management forum came just a day after the regulator had admitted that a number of superannuation funds had faced liquidity issues stemming from the ERS which had needed to be addressed by converting some investments into cash. 

Byres said that the liquidity issues flowing from the COVID-19 pandemic had not been surprising for the banks, but “came unexpectedly to the fore for the superannuation sector with the Government’s decision to temporarily implement an expanded early release scheme”. 

“The Reserve Bank intervened early and strongly as COVID-19 took hold to make sure the financial system as a whole had plenty of funding and liquidity. But that did not mean there weren’t challenges for individual firms and funds,” he said. 

“The superannuation sector, used to a stream of steady and predictable cash flows, had to grapple with a large, sudden and unexpected outflow. Banks benefited from that outflow from superannuation into household deposits, but on the other hand had to deal, for example, with a strong demand to redeem negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) well before their contractual maturity. 

“At the heart of the challenges experienced are behavioural assumptions that did not hold up. Risk management and prudential regulation, however, are both built on behavioural assumptions. The liquidity coverage ratio, for example, is built on assumptions of likely stressed outflows over a one-month time horizon.  

“But what about when those assumed stress flows prove inadequate? And what about liquidity needs sitting just beyond the one-month window? Both are issues on which we need to reflect on and consider whether – without seeking to raise requirements – we can adjust the framework to make the system more resilient to liquidity stress.”  

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 8 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 12 hours ago