AIST calls for tailored super projections

AIST PDS superannuation trustees australian securities and investments commission chief executive government

12 November 2008
| By Mike Taylor |

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has warned that end-benefit projections risk being irrelevant to members unless they are net of all fees and charges and linked to members’ investment choices.

AIST said it supports the concept of mandated end-benefit projections (under strict regulatory control), as well as the standardisation of calculation methods.

Projections should, however, “be personalised to reflect the investment options and fee structure of the fund to which each member belongs”.

“There is no point introducing end-benefit projections that are so general they become meaningless,” AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said.

“Consumers need to be able to see the details of their fund, not some mythical fund, and have a clear understanding of the impact of fees, their investment choice and the effect of their pension entitlements,” Reynolds said.

AIST said end-benefit projections would be even more useful if they were linked to members’ pension entitlements.

In its submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) consultation paper on superannuation forecasts, the AIST recommended that rather than the Government mandating the rates of returns used in end-benefit projections, assumptions should be based on information in the fund’s Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).

The AIST said the projected earnings figures in a fund’s PDS could be used for this purpose, as the PDS is subject to regulatory approval.

And while the AIST sees calculators and end benefit projections as “complementary services”, it believes calculators should be optional rather than mandatory, but both should be regulated.

The industry body said this was “important to avoid the sorts of problems experienced in the UK in the 1990s, when consumer forecasting tools were widely abused by commissioned agents”.

“It’s vital that we have the right regulatory framework — particularly when it comes to the setting of assumptions — to protect consumers from being misinformed by overly-optimistic forecasts,” Reynolds said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

5 days 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS