AFCA entering uncharted territory on super complaints

superannuation complaints tribunal ASFA AFCA complaints

22 October 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The transfer of up to 20 unfinished cases from the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) represents a step into unprecedented legal territory and the consequences need to be clearly communicated to the super fund members involved.

That is the warning to AFCA from the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) which has pointed out that, in most instances, the unfinished complaints will have been in existence for a number of years.

“The cessation of the SCT and the transfer of its remaining complaints is a significant legal development, one that is unprecedented for the superannuation industry,” ASFA has warned in a submission.

“Given the magnitude of the change and its impact, ASFA considers it imperative that clear communication is provided to affected consumers. ASFA is of the view this communication should be provided by the SCT and AFCA.

“It is likely that a superannuation trustee involved in an unresolved complaint before the SCT will, in the course of any communication with the complainant, provide some notification. However, where a consumer is involved in a dispute with their superannuation provider that has progressed to external dispute resolution (EDR) and remained unresolved for an extended period of time, we consider they are more likely to take note —and place trust in — information received from the EDR body (or bodies) considering their claim.”

The ASFA submission said that while the proposed changes are expected to affect only a small number of consumers, their potential impact on those consumers should not be underestimated.

“Where a consumer’s appeal from a determination of the SCT remains with the Federal Court, the decision or conduct to which it relates will quite likely have occurred several years ago. These consumers will need to be provided with certainty that AFCA can take any actions that may previously have fallen to the SCT, to ensure that the court’s judgment is given effect to,” it said.

“Given the SCT ceased to accept new superannuation complaints after 31 October, 2018, a consumer involved in a transferred complaint has already waited an unacceptably long time for resolution. They will, understandably, be concerned that they may face further delays, and may be apprehensive about how the transfer to AFCA may affect them practically.

“They will require reassurance and clear information about how they may personally be affected. Significantly, we anticipate that many of the complainants with unresolved SCT complaints will not have legal representation to help them navigate this important change.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 13 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 17 hours ago