20% of super funds may fail YFYS

15 July 2021
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

Close to 20% of superannuation funds face a high risk of failure under the ‘Your Future, Your Super’ performance test and around two-thirds of those might fail the test again in the following year, according to modelling by implementation manager Parametric Portfolio Associates.

The firm’s analysis showed that the probability of a second failure was very high due to the fact that the next performance test would include 87.5% of the same data which meant that seven of the eight years measured would be the same.

Under the new performance test, products that underperformed their net investment return benchmark by 0.5 percentage points per year over an eight-year period would be classified as underperforming.

This would mean that trustees whose products failed the test would be required to notify members in writing and products that failed the test two years in a row would not be permitted to accept new members until their net investment performance improved.

Therefore to reduce the probability of failing the performance test, a fund would need to either decrease its level of tracking error or increase its expected information ratio.

“It will require quite a performance turnaround the next year to bring the fund back to safer ground. Any fund whose strategy is to rely on their brand strength and member loyalty to survive the occasional single failure should think twice,” Whitlam Zhang, manager research and strategy at Parametric said.

“The good news is that tracking error is within the control of a super fund. While it cannot be controlled to a fine degree, it can be dialled up and down.”

Those options to dial down risk might include increasing allocations to low tracking error strategies, such as passive or enhanced passive investing; implementation of stricter rebalancing rules to reduce active risk from straying from their strategic allocations; and ensuring that the fund’s risk reporting included total risk and benchmark relative risk.

“It means that investment teams will need even higher conviction in their fund managers in order to compete in this market. Investment strategies that will do well in this regime are solutions that can deliver excess returns in a relatively more predictable manner,” Zhang said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 4 days ago